Showing posts with label VM configuration methodologies (was Re: EC2 alternatives). Show all posts
Showing posts with label VM configuration methodologies (was Re: EC2 alternatives). Show all posts

Thursday, July 10, 2008

RE: VM configuration methodologies (was Re: EC2 alternatives)

>
> On Jul 8, 2008, at 7:41 PM, PeterNic wrote:
> > Moving VM images is not the best thing do -- it is probably
> the worst.
> Right. And relatively opaque.
>
> > Similar effects can be achieved with Puppet and derivatives -- but I
> > expect those will end up being fragile, as a lot of things have to
> > happen just right and multiple platforms (see elsewhere my
> admonitions
> > about the level of abstraction on which we manage things).

Ah Puppet isn't fragile and use Puppet quite a bit. While not perfect and
does have some bugs to work out. It works and works VERY well.

IMHO is much better than using pre-built images. With Puppet you can mix
and match a setup to be exactly what is specified. With images it's not as
simple, nor is keeping them updated.

-L
--
Larry Ludwig
Empowering Media
1-866-792-0489 x600
Fully Managed VPSes
http://www.hostcube.com/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cloud Computing" group.
To post to this group, send email to cloud-computing@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cloud-computing-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To post job listing, send email to jobs@cloudjobs.net (position title, employer and location in subject, description in message body) or visit http://www.cloudjobs.net
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.ca/group/cloud-computing?hl=en?hl=en
Posting guidelines:

http://groups.google.ca/group/cloud-computing/web/frequently-asked-questions
To invite your colleague http://groups.google.com/group/cloud-computing/members_invite
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Re: VM configuration methodologies (was Re: EC2 alternatives)

On Jul 8, 9:42 pm, Randy Bias <ran...@cloudscale.net> wrote:
>
> Obviously I disagree. :) If it were fragile it wouldn't be in
> production at Google, Stanford, Wesabe, Powerset, and many other
> places.
...
> I haven't read what you said elsewhere about abstraction, but Puppet
> is essentially an abstraction layer, not a brittle scripting language,
> nor a heavyweight XML language, nor proprietary.

Randy, I didn't mean to put down Puppet -- I think it is an excellent
tool and, in fact, we're trying to figure out if there can be some
synergy in using it together with our virtual appliance catalog
concept in AppLogic (still working on that).

On the rest -- copying VM images, we do agree :)

Best regards,
-- Peter

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cloud Computing" group.
To post to this group, send email to cloud-computing@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cloud-computing-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To post job listing, send email to jobs@cloudjobs.net (position title, employer and location in subject, description in message body) or visit http://www.cloudjobs.net
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.ca/group/cloud-computing?hl=en?hl=en
Posting guidelines:
http://groups.google.ca/group/cloud-computing/web/frequently-asked-questions
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---